Defamation Defences
Defamation Defences
Defamation Defences: 7 Defences available to Defendant
1. Justification or Truth – Must show facts!
a. Defendant must prove truth of statement – Not Easy!
b. These are not valid defences:
i. Honest belief in Statement
ii. Honest belief in Source
iii. Honest belief in Circumstance
2. Fair Comment – The most popular defence (Freedom of Speech)
a. Sting must be a comment, not a fact
b. Comment is objective
c. Comment is based on fact (Factual Basis) – Test: “Ordinary, Reasonable, Right-Thinking people”
d. Public Interest *
e. No Malice **
3. Qualified Privilege
a. Shared Common Interest
i. Confidentiality is NOT Qualified Privilege
b. Social, Legal, Moral Duty * (Does media have a duty?)
c. Reports of Proceedings
d. No Malice **
4. Statutory Privilege
a. Only Newspapers & Broadcasters have Statutory Privilege
b. The report is listed in the Schedule *
c. No blasphemous, seditious, indecent, or illegal material
d. Must be for public concern and public benefit
e. No Malice **
Absolute Privilege
f. Applies to certain situations where a person should have the right to speak frankly without fear of reprisal
i. In Court – Witness Statements, From one Lawyer to another, From Lawyer to Client, etc.
ii. In the Course of Duty – From one public officer to another
iii. In Parliament
g. No blasphemous, seditious, indecent, or illegal material
h. No Malice *
5. Innocent Publication
a. Applies only to publisher – The 3rd Party
b. Exercised reasonable care in relation to publication – Checking facts, etc.
c. No knowledge of contents of “Sting”, or who they referred to
d. Nothing about the publication looks like a “Sting” on the surface
e. Must make an Offer of Amends – Publish a sufficient apology, Retract all defamatory material, Inform all distributors about the error
f. No Malice *
6. Innocent Dissemination
a. Applies to all who “assisted” in publication of a “sting” – Distributors
b. Exercised reasonable care in relation to distribution of publication
c. No knowledge of contents of “Sting”, or who they referred to
d. Nothing about the publication looks like a “Sting” on the surface
e. No Malice *
7. Consent
a. Plaintiff gave Defendant permission to publish the “Sting”
b. Defendant must prove this took place – Written consent, on video or audio, photo, etc.
Singapore Statutes Online (Defamation Act): http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/non_version/cgi-bin/cgi_retrieve.pl?actno=REVED-75&doctitle=DEFAMATION%20ACT%0A&date=latest&method=part&sl=1
.....
CONVERSATION